nanog mailing list archives

Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over?

From: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <ml () t-b-o-h net>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 19:04:48 -0500 (EST)


On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 04:40:20PM -0500, Randy Epstein wrote:

Problem resolved?


https://www.sprint.net/cogent.php

        Check out the <TITLE> of the document. Me thinks it was a
rush job to post up the page and a bit of cut/paste was done. ;)

                Tuc

Current thread:

Re: Why do some companies get depeered and some don't? Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 01)
- Re: Why do some companies get depeered and some don't? Joe Maimon (Nov 02)
  - Re: Why do some companies get depeered and some don't? Brandon Galbraith (Nov 02)
    - Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Randy Epstein (Nov 02)
    - RE: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Johnson, Joe (Nov 02)
    - Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Daniel Roesen (Nov 02)
    - Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET (Nov 02)
    - Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Randy Bush (Nov 02)
    - Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Brandon Galbraith (Nov 02)
    - Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Simon Lockhart (Nov 02)
    - Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Paul Wall (Nov 02)
    - Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Seth Mattinen (Nov 02)
    - Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Martin Hannigan (Nov 02)
    - Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Seth Mattinen (Nov 02)
    - Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Justin Ream (Nov 02)
    - Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? James Hess (Nov 02)
    - Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Paul Vixie (Nov 03)

(Thread continues...)