nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 routing /48s
From: Paul Timmins <paul () telcodata us>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:07:17 -0500
GRE. The problem we have (I think) is that the tunnel goes to something other than the direct router we have the DS3 on. The tunnel goes: vzb->ds3 router->ethernet->another router We aren't able to do more than a 1500 byte MTU, so when they send packets larger than 1380 or so, the packets never make it to my end. They get an IPv4 packet too large, and their router doesn't do anything to either lower the MTU of the tunnel (they have changed settings on their side but evidently not the right ones, because it's not changed anything at all) or translate that to an IPv6 packet too big somehow, so the packet just disappears into thin air. -Paul On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 13:48 -1000, Antonio Querubin wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Paul Timmins wrote:You too, huh?Is your IPv6 tunnel with vzb using GRE or 6-in-4 encapsulation? Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Niels Bakker (Nov 25)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Mark Andrews (Nov 25)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Florian Weimer (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Leo Bicknell (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jeroen Massar (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Pekka Savola (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Geoff Huston (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Antonio Querubin (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Paul Timmins (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Antonio Querubin (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Paul Timmins (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Christopher Morrow (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Kevin Loch (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Nathan Ward (Nov 19)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jack Bates (Nov 19)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Michael Sinatra (Nov 19)
- RE: IPv6 routing /48s TJ (Nov 19)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jack Bates (Nov 19)