nanog mailing list archives
Re: MPLS for IPv6
From: Julien Goodwin <nanog () studio442 com au>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:53:10 +1100
On 10/11/08 17:36, Miya Kohno wrote:
<with my vendor hat off...> If we consider the phases in terms of IPv6 deployment...., Ph-0: IPv4 only Ph-1: IPv4/v6 dual stack + v4/v6 coexistence technologies Ph-2: IPv6 only
Hmm, not quite. I'd say: v4 only v4/v6 dual stack, with v4 being primary (for network management, routing, etc) v4/v6 dual stack, with v6 primary v6 only Julien
Current thread:
- MPLS for IPv6 devang patel (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Charles Wyble (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 devang patel (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Charles Wyble (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Daniel Roesen (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Nathan Ward (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 David Freedman (Nov 07)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Mark Tinka (Nov 09)
- RE: MPLS for IPv6 Miya Kohno (Nov 09)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Julien Goodwin (Nov 09)
- RE: MPLS for IPv6 Miya Kohno (Nov 09)
- RE: MPLS for IPv6 David Freedman (Nov 10)
- RE: MPLS for IPv6 Miya Kohno (Nov 10)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Charles Wyble (Nov 04)