nanog mailing list archives
RE: MPLS for IPv6
From: "Miya Kohno" <mkohno () juniper net>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:36:46 +0800
<with my vendor hat off...> If we consider the phases in terms of IPv6 deployment...., Ph-0: IPv4 only Ph-1: IPv4/v6 dual stack + v4/v6 coexistence technologies Ph-2: IPv6 only I suppose MPLS v6 control plane would become necessary at Ph-2, or a later stage of Ph-1. In the meantime, MPLS can be viewed as one of the v4/v6 coexistence technologies. IPv6 traffic can be carried over v4 signaled MPLS LSP in various ways (i.e. 6PE/6VPN, static mapping onto TE-LSP, IGP cutthrough..). Miya
-----Original Message----- From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mtinka () globaltransit net] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 10:46 AM To: nanog () nanog org Cc: David Freedman Subject: Re: MPLS for IPv6 On Friday 07 November 2008 17:22:33 David Freedman wrote:So please, if you are spending your hard earned cash,please ask foran LDP6 implementation, "no demand" should not be the case.I sent our SE's at C & J yet another reminder about this. Mark.
Current thread:
- MPLS for IPv6 devang patel (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Charles Wyble (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 devang patel (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Charles Wyble (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Daniel Roesen (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Nathan Ward (Nov 04)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 David Freedman (Nov 07)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Mark Tinka (Nov 09)
- RE: MPLS for IPv6 Miya Kohno (Nov 09)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Julien Goodwin (Nov 09)
- RE: MPLS for IPv6 Miya Kohno (Nov 09)
- RE: MPLS for IPv6 David Freedman (Nov 10)
- RE: MPLS for IPv6 Miya Kohno (Nov 10)
- Re: MPLS for IPv6 Charles Wyble (Nov 04)