nanog mailing list archives
Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage
From: "Marc Farnum Rendino" <mvgfr1 () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 04:56:24 -0500
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net> wrote:
More regs and more laws is certainly not in the running.
Why?
How about: If there is a need, somebody will provide at a suitable price? If no body steps up, we don't need it.
There seems to be ample evidence, in many arenas, that naked capitalism can have disastrous results.
Current thread:
- routing around Sprint's depeering damage Dave Blaine (Nov 01)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Larry Sheldon (Nov 01)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Marc Farnum Rendino (Nov 02)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Larry Sheldon (Nov 02)
- RE: routing around Sprint's depeering damage James Jun (Nov 02)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Matthew Kaufman (Nov 02)
- RE: routing around Sprint's depeering damage James Jun (Nov 02)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Joe Greco (Nov 02)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Michael Thomas (Nov 02)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Adam Rothschild (Nov 02)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Matthew Petach (Nov 02)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Matthew Petach (Nov 02)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Marc Farnum Rendino (Nov 02)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage George William Herbert (Nov 03)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Larry Sheldon (Nov 01)