nanog mailing list archives

Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage

From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2008 19:04:08 -0500

Dave Blaine wrote:

Which is the best way?


More regs and more laws is certainly not in the running.

How about: If there is a need, somebody will provide at a suitableprice? If no body steps up, we don't need it.

Current thread:

routing around Sprint's depeering damage Dave Blaine (Nov 01)
- Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Larry Sheldon (Nov 01)
  - Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Marc Farnum Rendino (Nov 02)
    - Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Larry Sheldon (Nov 02)
    - RE: routing around Sprint's depeering damage James Jun (Nov 02)
    - Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Matthew Kaufman (Nov 02)
    - RE: routing around Sprint's depeering damage James Jun (Nov 02)
    - Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Joe Greco (Nov 02)
    - Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Michael Thomas (Nov 02)
    - Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Adam Rothschild (Nov 02)
    - Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Matthew Petach (Nov 02)
    - Re: routing around Sprint's depeering damage Matthew Petach (Nov 02)

(Thread continues...)