nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over?
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () isc org>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:49:18 +0000
Daniel Senie <dts () senie com> writes:
At 06:54 PM 11/2/2008, Daniel Roesen wrote:https://www.sprint.net/cogent.php... Also in this document is a complaint that Cogent failed to disconnect. Excuse me? This was a trial PEERING agreement. That implies one or a series of point-to-point connections. That implies EITHER party can disconnect the circuits (in reality, the physical circuit doesn't even matter, just shut down the BGP session(s)). ...
Not having read the contract in question, my assumption when I read Sprint's account of their depeering of Cogent was that the trial peering contract says "Sprint will notify Cogent of its qualification status after 90 days; if in Sprint's estimation Cogent does not qualify, and Sprint notifies Cogent of that fact, then Cogent will either disconnect or start paying." Sprint's document's wording is careful even if their <TITLE> is not. If they are involved in litigation with Cogent then actual lawyers would have seen that text (if not necessarily the <TITLE>) before it went out. The heart of the lawsuit might be whether Cogent did or didn't implicitly agree to pay, as signalled by their lack of disconnection after their 90 day notice. None of us who aren't parties to the dispute can do other than wonder, ponder, guess. -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over?, (continued)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Seth Mattinen (Nov 02)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Justin Ream (Nov 02)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? James Hess (Nov 02)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Paul Vixie (Nov 03)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Florian Weimer (Nov 03)
- RE: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Randy Epstein (Nov 02)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 02)
- RE: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Randy Epstein (Nov 02)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Daniel Senie (Nov 03)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 03)
- Re: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Paul Vixie (Nov 03)
- RE: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Martin Hannigan (Nov 03)
- RE: Sprint / Cogent dispute over? Deepak Jain (Nov 03)
- Re: Why do some companies get depeered and some don't? Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 02)
- Re: Why do some companies get depeered and some don't? Mike Lyon (Nov 04)
- Re: Why do some companies get depeered and some don't? Mark Foster (Nov 05)
- Re: Why do some companies get depeered and some don't? Jasper Bryant-Greene (Nov 05)
- Re: Why do some companies get depeered and some don't? Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 05)