Re: [NANOG] Questions about NETCONF

[John Payne <john () sackheads org>]

On May 15, 2008, at 10:28 PM, 袁智辉 wrote:

> How is the state of arts of NETCONF (RFC 4741) protocol?
>
> Is there any Network Management System Deployed which is base on  
> NETCONF?

I've personally been waiting for the data modeling to be  
standardized.  Yes, it's great and wonderful to have a consistent  
method of talking to network devices, but I also want a standard data  
model along with it.

> Do you think security products (like Firewall, IDS/IPS and Security
> Operation Centre) can benefit from NETCONF?

I believe any network device can benefit from netconf.


_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
NANOG () nanog org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog