nanog mailing list archives
latency (was: RE: cooling door)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 01:20:16 +0100 (CET)
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008, Frank Coluccio wrote:
We often discuss the empowerment afforded by optical technology, but we've barely scratched the surface of its ability to effect meaningful architectural changes.
If you talk to the server people, they have an issue with this: Latency.I've talked to people who have collapsed layers in their LAN because they can see performance degradation for each additional switch packets have to pass in their NFS-mount. Yes, higher speeds means lower serialisation delay, but there is still a lookup time involved and 10GE is substantionally more expensive than GE.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: cooling door, (continued)
- Re: cooling door Paul Vixie (Mar 29)
- Re: cooling door Wayne E. Bouchard (Mar 29)
- RE: cooling door michael.dillon (Mar 29)
- Message not available
- Re: cooling door Robert Boyle (Mar 29)
- Re: cooling door Henry Yen (Mar 30)
- Re: cooling door Paul Vixie (Mar 29)
- Re: cooling door Matthew Petach (Mar 30)
- Message not available
- Re: cooling door paul (Mar 30)
- Re: cooling door Deepak Jain (Mar 31)
- RE: cooling door david raistrick (Mar 29)
- latency (was: RE: cooling door) Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 29)
- Re: cooling door vijay gill (Mar 31)
- RE: cooling door michael.dillon (Mar 31)
- Re: cooling door Christopher Morrow (Mar 31)
- Re: cooling door Patrick Giagnocavo (Mar 29)
- Re: cooling door John A. Kilpatrick (Mar 29)
- Re: cooling door Deepak Jain (Mar 31)