nanog mailing list archives

Re: 10GE router resource


From: "Aaron Glenn" <aaron.glenn () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:13:24 -0700


On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Patrick Clochesy <patrick () chegg com> wrote:
Very interesting study I had not seen, and a bummer. That really puts a
cramp in my advocation of our CARP+pf load balancers/firewalls/gateways.
Than again, what's a PIX box capable of?

I'd rather tweak a whitebox than pay through the nose for a PIX.

I also had to switch to OpenBSD as there was a fatal crash with the bridge
device in FreeBSD when used with my paticular OpenVPN/CARP/pf combination.

AFAIK pf/forwarding only takes place on one core and wouldn't take advantage
of the other 3 cores, correct?

Correct. There has been some great speed and efficiency improvements
in pf and other networking parts of OpenBSD; though from anecdotal
evidence, 10GbE is not ready for 'primetime' (for certain definitions
of 'primetime').

actually I'll just skip making an ass out of myself and hope henning@
chimes in, since I believe he reads NANOG as well.

aaron.glenn


Current thread: