nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 tunnel for ISP sought
From: Ross Vandegrift <ross () kallisti us>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:11:04 -0400
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 03:44:14PM -0400, Joel Snyder wrote:
We have a UUnet link and a secondary provider. The secondary provider has no IPv6 facilities. UUnet (er, Verizon Business) has IPv6 clue, but there is an impenetrable wall between the customer and the clue which assures that there will be no IPv6 links or tunnels ever given to customers.
Hi Joel, Most ISPs that are doing IPv6 have contacts outside of the normal support and sales infrastructure for dealing with IPv6 turn up. Sprint, for example, has a different email address that you can hit and get straight to some people that understand what you're asking about. Searching in whois maybe points to ipv6ops () eng us uu net and if that doesn't pan out, someone on ipv6-ops might have a better idea. -- Ross Vandegrift ross () kallisti us "The good Christian should beware of mathematicians, and all those who make empty prophecies. The danger already exists that the mathematicians have made a covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and to confine man in the bonds of Hell." --St. Augustine, De Genesi ad Litteram, Book II, xviii, 37
Current thread:
- IPv6 tunnel for ISP sought Joel Snyder (Mar 22)
- Re: IPv6 tunnel for ISP sought William Herrin (Mar 22)
- Re: IPv6 tunnel for ISP sought Kevin Day (Mar 22)
- Re: IPv6 tunnel for ISP sought Seth Mattinen (Mar 22)
- Re: IPv6 tunnel for ISP sought Mike Leber (Mar 22)
- Re: IPv6 tunnel for ISP sought Jeroen Massar (Mar 22)
- Re: IPv6 tunnel for ISP sought Ross Vandegrift (Mar 23)
- Re: IPv6 tunnel for ISP sought Adam Armstrong (Mar 26)
- Re: IPv6 tunnel for ISP sought Mike Leber (Mar 26)