nanog mailing list archives

Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs


From: Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:36:47 -0500 (CDT)

On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
This requires serious elaboration. How could you use a domain in
".exe" to actually attack someone? (No handwaving, please, actual
study.)


I think it would be the other way around - I would assume that that
was a near worthless TLD, as it
would come with a built in DOS : If I had (say) program.exe as a
domain name,
what Windows user would ever type it in ?

        I think this would be one of the TLDs that they'd refuse.
Then again, there are DOS commands that do end in .com (CHOICE,
COMMAND, CMD, DISKCOMP, HELP,etc). More can be seen at :
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/72188

What about .stupid?

        Gadi.



                Tuc/TBOH



Current thread: