nanog mailing list archives

Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs


From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () baylink com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:39:30 -0400

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:01:23AM -0400, Jean-Fran?ois Mezei wrote:
Does anyone know how if the new gTLD system will still give some "veto"
power to some people over some domain names that are morally objectable
to some people ?

I am not thinking of only .SEX but perhaps also .GOD .GAY .ALLAH .BI
.CHRISTIAN .LESBIAN .MORMON .JEW .JEWISH .ISLAM etc.

.WOMEN-WITH-VISIBLE-FACES?

For instance, in the USA "ABC" is the american broadcasting companies,
but in australia, it is the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

Is it fair to hand .ABC to either one of the two ? (highest bidder) or
will ICANN "lock" .ABC out so that neither can get to it ? I am sure
there are many such gTLDs around the world that would conflict across
countries.

Sure, which is why that's not what should be being *done* with GTLDs.

But engineering issues will be the very least of anyone's concern here.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
ay R. Ashworth                                                jra () baylink com
Designer                +-Internetworking------+---------+            RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates   |  Best Practices Wiki |         |             '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA    +-http://bestpractices.wikia.com-+     +1 727 647 1274

      If you can read this... thank a system administrator.  Or two.  --me


Current thread: