nanog mailing list archives
Re: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:25:39 -0400
On Jun 18, 2008, at 7:57 AM, Joe Provo wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:59:21PM -0700, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote: [snip]"See no evil, hear no evil, fear no evil"The (human) operators who cared have been pushed out by the (coprorate) operators who would rather disavow responsibility, turn up quickly, and book the revenue instead of vetting any customer claims for basis in fact or reason. Customer filtering -even when black hats drive an AS- is Not Hard if the backbones (nets) displayed actual backbone (spine).
I would argue the same for any/all security issues. If people would just shut off $VALUE, we'd have a lot fewer problems on the network. I will concede the problem is making it scale and viable for some parties. The ones that don't make the inherent security of the global network a priority are dragging the average down.
- jaredVALUE = ( infected host ip/customer, route leaker/hijacker, nonfiltering customer, ... )
Current thread:
- Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 17)
- Re: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story Justin Shore (Jun 17)
- Re: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 17)
- Re: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story Randy Bush (Jun 17)
- RE: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story Tomas L. Byrnes (Jun 17)
- Re: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story Joe Provo (Jun 18)
- Re: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story Jared Mauch (Jun 18)
- Re: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story Randy Bush (Jun 18)
- RE: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story Tomas L. Byrnes (Jun 17)
- RE: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story michael.dillon (Jun 18)
- Re: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story Justin Shore (Jun 17)