nanog mailing list archives
RE: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story
From: <michael.dillon () bt com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:32:35 +0100
http://www.47-usc-230c2.org/chapter3.html This time 128.168/16 - and by the same group that seems to have acquired control of the earlier one.luckily, there is no black market in address space. or at least so the theory goes on arin and ripe public policy lists.
No, the theory goes that there *IS* a black market and changing ARIN or RIPE policies to make it a white market would be a bad idea. Better to help ARIN to document the fact that this is not a valid allocation so that they can recover the block. --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 17)
- Re: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story Justin Shore (Jun 17)
- Re: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 17)
- Re: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story Randy Bush (Jun 17)
- RE: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story Tomas L. Byrnes (Jun 17)
- Re: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story Joe Provo (Jun 18)
- Re: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story Jared Mauch (Jun 18)
- Re: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story Randy Bush (Jun 18)
- RE: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story Tomas L. Byrnes (Jun 17)
- RE: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story michael.dillon (Jun 18)
- Re: Latest instalment of the "hijacked /16s" story Justin Shore (Jun 17)