nanog mailing list archives

Re: Hardware capture platforms


From: "Network Fortius" <netfortius () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:45:15 -0500

Richard's blog @ http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/search?q=taps and
especially his books (Tao of Network Security Monitoring and Extrusion
Detection) are the best sources I have ever found, concerning [not only]
taps and[/but] so much more on the subject - proper usage and best
methodologies and practices for network monitoring (and not only for
security!!!)


Stefan

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com
wrote:

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
wrote:
Check out packet forensics depending on what your ultimate requirements
are.


I would also add a 'see packet forensics'...

On Jul 29, 2008, at 7:10 PM, "John A. Kilpatrick" <john () hypergeek net>
wrote:


We've deployed a bunch taps in our network and now we need a platform on
which to capture the data.  Our bandwidth is currently pretty low but
I've
got 8 links to tap, which means I need 16 ports.  Has anyone done any
research on doing accurate packet capture with commodity hardware?


--
                             John A. Kilpatrick
john () hypergeek net                Email|     http://www.hypergeek.net/
john-page () hypergeek net      Text pages|          ICQ: 19147504
               remember:  no obstacles/only challenges








Current thread: