nanog mailing list archives
Re: Hardware capture platforms
From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:12:09 +0100
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net> wrote:
Check out packet forensics depending on what your ultimate requirements are.
I would also add a 'see packet forensics'...
On Jul 29, 2008, at 7:10 PM, "John A. Kilpatrick" <john () hypergeek net> wrote:We've deployed a bunch taps in our network and now we need a platform on which to capture the data. Our bandwidth is currently pretty low but I've got 8 links to tap, which means I need 16 ports. Has anyone done any research on doing accurate packet capture with commodity hardware? -- John A. Kilpatrick john () hypergeek net Email| http://www.hypergeek.net/ john-page () hypergeek net Text pages| ICQ: 19147504 remember: no obstacles/only challenges
Current thread:
- Hardware capture platforms John A. Kilpatrick (Jul 29)
- Re: Hardware capture platforms Jared Mauch (Jul 29)
- Re: Hardware capture platforms Christian Koch (Jul 29)
- Re: Hardware capture platforms Christopher Morrow (Jul 29)
- Re: Hardware capture platforms Network Fortius (Jul 29)
- Re: Hardware capture platforms James Pleger (Jul 29)
- RE: Hardware capture platforms Darryl Dunkin (Jul 29)
- Re: Hardware capture platforms Warren Kumari (Jul 30)
- Re: Hardware capture platforms Jon Kibler (Jul 30)
- Re: Hardware capture platforms Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 31)
- Re: Hardware capture platforms Warren Kumari (Jul 31)
- Re: Hardware capture platforms Jon Meek (Jul 31)
- Re: Hardware capture platforms Lynda (Jul 30)
- RE: Hardware capture platforms Matthew Huff (Jul 30)
- Re: Hardware capture platforms Jared Mauch (Jul 29)