nanog mailing list archives

Re: So why don't US citizens get this?


From: "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy () druid net>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:42:13 -0400

On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:29:38 -0500 (CDT)
Joe Greco <jgreco () ns sol net> wrote:
The key thing in that definition is the lack of government  
intervention in its various forms. That's D'Arcy's point. Where there  
is government subsidy, regulation, or other intervention, it cannot be  
described as a free market.

Actually, it could...  but you have to understand the situation better.

Ah.  I didn't realize that I just didn't understand the situation as
well as you.  Thanks for setting me straight.

If you call a tail a leg, how many legs does a dog have?
Four.  Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it one.
   Abraham Lincoln

As I said, I mostly agree with you in your analysis.  The main thing I
differ on is your definition.  The market is not free and just calling
it free doesn't change that.

This will be my last post along this thread, due to thread drift.

Me too.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy () druid net>         |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.


Current thread: