nanog mailing list archives

Re: Ubiquity<->Mzima routing loop


From: "Sena, Rich" <rsena () mitre org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:56:41 -0400

Man it's been awhile...

"Godwin..." errr maybe it's "Nazi" - or perhaps "Boursey" damn how do
we stop this again?!?!

Please only reply if you remember the magic word to make this thread
stop!

-- 
via the Blackberry Xpress!

----- Original Message -----
From: Guy_Shields () Stream Com <Guy_Shields () Stream Com>
To: Paul Wall <pauldotwall () gmail com>
Cc: nanog <nanog () merit edu>
Sent: Fri Jul 18 22:33:12 2008
Subject: Re: Ubiquity<->Mzima routing loop

No, a true routing loop will transit several hops and end back up at
the same routers. A bouncing route between 2 routers is usually a
directly connected route on an interface that goes down thereby
"pulling" the route with out a nail down route it will send unkown
route back out its default gateway. 


----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Wall" [pauldotwall () gmail com]
Sent: 07/18/2008 10:25 PM AST
To: Guy Shields
Cc: nanog <nanog () merit edu>
Subject: Re: Ubiquity<->Mzima routing loop



Isn't that what a routing loop is, when it loops back out to the
transit/interface from which it entered?

Paul

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 7:07 PM,  <Guy_Shields () stream com> wrote:
This is not a routing loop. It is simply a route that was not tied
down via a static route to NULL with a weight of 254.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Wall" [pauldotwall () gmail com]
Sent: 07/18/2008 06:57 PM AST
To: "William Pitcock" <nenolod () systeminplace net>
Cc: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: Ubiquity<->Mzima routing loop



I'd like to rip on Mzima as much as the next guy, but I'm not sure
how
they could "fix" this routing loop, shy of some creative ACLs.

You should try contacting Ubiquity, as this traceroute looks like an
issue on their (Mzima's customer's) side.

Paul Wall

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 3:27 PM, William Pitcock
<nenolod () systeminplace net> wrote:
Hi,

Can someone at Ubiquity or Mzima fix this routing loop:

traceroute to hg.atheme.org (72.37.225.164), 30 hops max, 40 byte
packets
 1  64.62.134.193  12.402 ms  12.370 ms  12.363 ms
 2  ge5-0.cr01.ord01.mzima.net (206.223.119.62)  16.003 ms  15.985
ms
15.964 ms
 3  ge0-ubiquity.cust.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.158)  14.139 ms
14.858
ms  14.838 ms
 4  ge0-12.cr01.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.157)  15.875 ms  15.854
ms
16.497 ms
 5  ge0-ubiquity.cust.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.158)  14.747 ms
14.763
ms  14.745 ms
 6  ge0-12.cr01.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.157)  16.405 ms  8.773 ms
8.758 ms
 7  ge0-ubiquity.cust.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.158)  9.831 ms * *
 8  ge0-12.cr01.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.157)  4.417 ms  4.403 ms
4.381 ms
 9  * * *
10  ge0-12.cr01.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.157)  4.293 ms  4.933 ms
4.914 ms
11  * * *
12  ge0-12.cr01.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.157)  14.527 ms  14.526
ms
14.438 ms
13  * * *
14  ge0-12.cr01.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.157)  14.352 ms  14.335
ms
3.770 ms
15  * * *
16  ge0-12.cr01.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.157)  3.684 ms  13.897 ms
13.897 ms
17  * * *
18  ge0-12.cr01.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.157)  8.599 ms  8.581 ms
8.668 ms
19  * * ge0-ubiquity.cust.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.158)  8.246 ms
20  ge0-12.cr01.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.157)  8.584 ms  8.565 ms
8.545 ms
21  * * ge0-ubiquity.cust.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.158)  8.119 ms
22  ge0-12.cr01.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.157)  8.456 ms  8.931 ms
8.913 ms
23  * ge0-ubiquity.cust.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.158)  6.049 ms *
24  ge0-12.cr01.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.157)  15.862 ms  15.754
ms
15.736 ms
25  ge0-ubiquity.cust.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.158)  7.132 ms *
7.092
ms
26  ge0-12.cr01.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.157)  15.293 ms  15.998
ms
10.752 ms
27  ge0-ubiquity.cust.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.158)  5.353 ms
5.336
ms *
28  ge0-12.cr01.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.157)  3.800 ms  3.854 ms
3.823 ms
29  * * *
30  ge0-12.cr01.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.157)  3.228 ms  4.426 ms
13.019 ms

Thanks!

William








Current thread: