nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ubiquity<->Mzima routing loop
From: William Pitcock <nenolod () systeminplace net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:49:25 -0500
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 13:32 -0700, Aaron Glenn wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 1:02 PM, William Pitcock <nenolod () systeminplace net> wrote:Hi, Sadly, I don't have any contact with either one, but I do need to be able to access that server, and it's responsible admin is no where to be found.common sense and courtesy says you should contact ubiquity, then mzima before even thinking of hitting up nanog@ and, wild guess, it looks like it's probably on the ubiquity side of things.
I'm aware what side it's on. However, I didn't have contact information for an actual human on either side of the link, so I posted on nanog@. Normally, I wouldn't take such an action, but the availability of services on that machine (revision control for several open source projects as a starting point), makes the machine's availability essential. William
Current thread:
- Ubiquity<->Mzima routing loop William Pitcock (Jul 18)
- Re: Ubiquity<->Mzima routing loop Aaron Glenn (Jul 18)
- Re: Ubiquity<->Mzima routing loop William Pitcock (Jul 18)
- Re: Ubiquity<->Mzima routing loop Aaron Glenn (Jul 18)
- Re: Ubiquity<->Mzima routing loop William Pitcock (Jul 18)
- Re: Ubiquity<->Mzima routing loop Joe Provo (Jul 18)
- Re: Ubiquity<->Mzima routing loop William Pitcock (Jul 18)
- Re: Ubiquity<->Mzima routing loop Aaron Glenn (Jul 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Ubiquity<->Mzima routing loop Guy_Shields (Jul 18)
- Re: Ubiquity<->Mzima routing loop Paul Wall (Jul 18)
- Re: Ubiquity<->Mzima routing loop Mike Lewinski (Jul 18)
- Re: Ubiquity<->Mzima routing loop Paul Wall (Jul 18)
- Re: Ubiquity<->Mzima routing loop Guy_Shields (Jul 18)
- Re: Ubiquity<->Mzima routing loop Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 19)
- Re: Ubiquity<->Mzima routing loop Sena, Rich (Jul 18)
- Re: Ubiquity<->Mzima routing loop Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Jul 18)