nanog mailing list archives
Re: SMTP addresses in <>
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:20:22 -0500
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 07:51:15AM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote: [snip]
Our mail servers reject connections that don't follow the RFC. Am I wrong to do this? This guy certainly thinks so, even after I've cited the RFC and appropriate section, his arguments is "even hotmail does not keep up the standards" and if we ignore them as well. Hotmail at least follows this rule... am I wrong to require the brackets?
"The" RFC is amusing WRT email. In this case, you are ignoring 3464, section 2 "Format of a Delivery Status Notification", viz: Whenever an SMTP transaction is used to send a DSN, the MAIL FROM command MUST use a NULL return address, i.e., "MAIL FROM:<>". Cheers, Joe -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
Current thread:
- Re: SMTP addresses in <>, (continued)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Andrew Sullivan (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Alexander Harrowell (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Sean Figgins (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Greg Skinner (Jan 04)
- [admin] Re: SMTP addresses in <> Martin Hannigan (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Randy Bush (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 04)
- Re: SMTP addresses in <> Jeff Kell (Jan 04)