nanog mailing list archives

[admin] Re: SMTP addresses in <>


From: "Martin Hannigan" <hannigan () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 13:33:05 -0500


Folks,

Let's bring this one to closure. The authors question is answered and
this is backing itself into an endless thread with arguments better
suited for the IETF vs. NANOG.

Best Regards,

Martin Hannigan
NANOG Mailing List Committee





On Jan 4, 2008 1:02 PM, Alexander Harrowell <a.harrowell () gmail com> wrote:
On Jan 4, 2008 5:52 PM, Andrew Sullivan <andrew () ca afilias info> wrote:



I completely agree.  If it weren't for that philosophy, we wouldn't
have an email problem at all.

A


Because....we wouldn't have e-mail? Consider the pain of getting worldwide
interoperability for a "notmail" system that insisted on strict
validation...




Current thread: