nanog mailing list archives
Re: v6 gluelessness
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis () neustar biz>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:48:04 -0500
At 15:35 +0100 1/22/08, Simon Leinen wrote:
(I think a well-known DNS implementation does or used to do it this Bad way, which was part of the reason that it sometimes locked on to a server with an unreachable IPv6 address and a fast-responding IPv4 address - and of course it would always try the IPv6 address first )-:
Used to do - but even though fixes have been done (4 years ago), there are still non-upgraded nodes out there.
-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468 NeuStar Think glocally. Act confused.
Current thread:
- Re: v6 gluelessness, (continued)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jan 21)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 22)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jan 22)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Joe Abley (Jan 22)
- Re: v6 gluelessness David Conrad (Jan 22)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Randy Bush (Jan 22)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Joe Abley (Jan 22)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 22)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Christopher Morrow (Jan 22)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Simon Leinen (Jan 22)
- Re: v6 gluelessness Edward Lewis (Jan 22)