nanog mailing list archives
Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers
From: Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 20:09:35 -0500
The only caveat is, that some parties may mess with it on prefixes they receive.
Which is true for all TE items.Just like a provider may local pref their own customers paths over external paths to get there even given the existence of TE. Some providers are quite rabid about this.
Perhaps we should also define TE at a high level as whether we are talking about default behavior in most cases, or some case where need absolute deterministic precision. I think we can agree on the Internet that the latter is not possible.
TE examples like the example Brian gives (which I am sure many of us are aware of) nicely fit into the first category.
Deepak
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 tracking assignments (OSS recommendations) See www.internetassociatesllc.com, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 tracking assignments (OSS recommendations) See www.internetassociatesllc.com Martin Hannigan (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6 tracking assignments (OSS recommendations) See www.internetassociatesllc.com John L Lee (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6 tracking assignments (OSS recommendations) See www.internetassociatesllc.com Martin Hannigan (Jan 04)
- Re: IPv6 tracking assignments (OSS recommendations) See www.internetassociatesllc.com John L Lee (Jan 04)
- Re: IPv6 tracking assignments (OSS recommendations) Scott Francis (Jan 04)
- Re: IPv6 tracking assignments (OSS recommendations) Deepak Jain (Jan 04)
- Re: IPv6 tracking assignments (OSS recommendations) Scott Francis (Jan 04)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Deepak Jain (Jan 02)