nanog mailing list archives
Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC?
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:22:00 +0100
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 12:58:11AM -0500, Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow () gmail com> wrote a message of 21 lines which said:
There was also some work ongoing in INCH, that included some machine-parsable reporting formats
For the technical side of abuse reporting, IETF documents two formats: The Intrusion Detection Message Exchange Format (IDMEF), RFC 4765, with a status of Experimental The Incident Object Description Exchange Format (IODEF), RFC 5070, which is Standard.
Current thread:
- Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Paul Ferguson (Jan 12)
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Randy Bush (Jan 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Paul Ferguson (Jan 12)
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Christopher Morrow (Jan 12)
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Steve Atkins (Jan 12)
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Sean Donelan (Jan 12)
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 13)
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jan 14)
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Christopher Morrow (Jan 12)
- Re[2]: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Paul Ferguson (Jan 12)
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Leigh Porter (Jan 13)
- RE: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Paul Ferguson (Jan 12)
- RE: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Sean Donelan (Jan 13)
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 13)
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Sean Donelan (Jan 13)
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Joel Jaeggli (Jan 14)
- RE: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Sean Donelan (Jan 13)
- Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC? Sean Donelan (Jan 13)