Re: Stupid Question: Network Abuse RFC?

[Steve Atkins <steve () blighty com>]

On Jan 12, 2008, at 9:58 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:

> On Jan 13, 2008 12:43 AM, Paul Ferguson <fergdawg () netzero net> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> > - -- Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
> >
> > > 2142
> > >
> > > but i am surprised you asked here instead of an ietf list.  here we
> > actually do the stuff, not tell other folk how they should do it.  :)
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for the pointer, and I even appreciate you snarky reply. :-)

2142 isn't really related to abuse much, other than suggesting
use of the abuse@ and security@ aliases for reporting. I can't think
of any other docs that are abuse related, useful and RFCs, though.

> >
>
> There was also some work ongoing in INCH, that included some
> machine-parsable reporting formats (RID I believe... Ms Moriarty's
> work, if I remember correctly)

ARF too, if the abuse is email-based.

http://www.shaftek.org/publications/drafts/abuse-report/
http://wordtothewise.com/resources/arf.html

Cheers,
  Steve