nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets.
From: JAKO Andras <jako.andras () eik bme hu>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:13:51 +0100 (CET)
At Inter.Net, we specifically excluded .0 and .255 from our DSL pools so as to not screw up the day of people running outdated Windows software any more than it was already screwed up.
According to Microsoft KB 281507 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;281579 even "XP Home" and "Server 2003 Standard" are affected. Could anyone share some pointers to test results or any other listing of broken and correct IP stacks regarding this issue? Andras
Current thread:
- Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Joshman at joshman dot com (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Joe Provo (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Jon Lewis (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Joe Provo (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Jon Lewis (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Robert E. Seastrom (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. JAKO Andras (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Jon Lewis (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Robert E. Seastrom (Jan 08)
- RE: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. David Schwartz (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. James R. Cutler (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Robert E. Seastrom (Jan 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Scott Weeks (Jan 08)
- Re: Using x.x.x.0 and x.x.x.255 host addresses in supernets. Joshman at joshman dot com (Jan 10)