Re: Blackholes and IXs and Completing the Attack.

["Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists () gmail com>]

On Feb 2, 2008 3:39 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes <tomb () byrneit net> wrote:

> The bigger issue with all these approaches is that they run afoul of a
> patent applied for by AT&T:
>
> http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u
> =%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=200
> 60031575&OS=20060031575&RS=20060031575
>
> USPTO App Number 20060031575

Somene from ATT may want to consider pulling this patent application
since it seems to fail on prior art...

http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0410/soricelli.html

presented  by a juniper employee (Joe Soricelli ) and Wayne Gustavus
from Verizon. IANAL though...