nanog mailing list archives
Re: e300 vs mx240 for border router ?
From: Leslie <leslie () craigslist org>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:27:57 -0800
Thanks to everyone who wrote back privately --I also didn't know that force10 now has dual-cam linecards which raises the amount of routes it can handle
Leslie wrote:
Hey nanog-izensSo for routers that are touching our transit and (hopefully soon) future peering, we're looking at both the force10 e300's and juniper mx240's. The e300's are cheap but I have heard some rumors/talk of falling over when it has to deal with large numbers of prefixes and routes? The mx240's are nice but the cost difference is enormous. Does anyone have experience with e300's running into issues with large routing tables? Are there any tricks/tips that work around any issues (if they exist?)Thanks in advance Leslie
Current thread:
- e300 vs mx240 for border router ? Leslie (Dec 12)
- RE: e300 vs mx240 for border router ? David Kotlerewsky (Dec 12)
- Re: e300 vs mx240 for border router ? Leslie (Dec 12)
- Re: e300 vs mx240 for border router ? Michael J McCafferty (Dec 12)
- Re: e300 vs mx240 for border router ? Ubaidali_Abdul_Razack (Dec 14)
- Re: e300 vs mx240 for border router ? Eugeniu Patrascu (Dec 15)
- Re: e300 vs mx240 for border router ? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 15)
- Re: e300 vs mx240 for border router ? Jerome Benoit (Dec 17)
- Re: e300 vs mx240 for border router ? Nathan Ward (Dec 17)
- Re: e300 vs mx240 for border router ? Michael J McCafferty (Dec 12)