nanog mailing list archives
Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958
From: Joe Abley <jabley () hopcount ca>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:44:28 -0500
On 10 Dec 2008, at 16:20, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Dec 10, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Cvetan Ivanov wrote:Marshall Eubanks wrote:Is there some reason why 65000 is especially problematic ?65000 and above are private as numbers and should not be seen in the global table.64512 & above.
Indeed, the reference is RFC 1930 section 10, which says: 10. Reserved AS Numbers The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) has reserved the following block of AS numbers for private use (not to be advertised on the global Internet): 64512 through 65535 Joe
Current thread:
- _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Andy Davidson (Dec 10)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Marshall Eubanks (Dec 10)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Cvetan Ivanov (Dec 10)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Marshall Eubanks (Dec 10)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 10)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Joe Abley (Dec 11)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 bill fumerola (Dec 11)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Cvetan Ivanov (Dec 10)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Marshall Eubanks (Dec 10)