nanog mailing list archives

Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958


From: Joe Abley <jabley () hopcount ca>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:44:28 -0500


On 10 Dec 2008, at 16:20, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:

On Dec 10, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Cvetan Ivanov wrote:
Marshall Eubanks wrote:

Is there some reason why 65000 is especially problematic ?

65000 and above are private as numbers and should not be seen in the global table.

64512 & above.

Indeed, the reference is RFC 1930 section 10, which says:

10. Reserved AS Numbers

   The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) has reserved the
   following block of AS numbers for private use (not to be advertised
   on the global Internet):

                           64512 through 65535


Joe


Current thread: