nanog mailing list archives

Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958

From: Cvetan Ivanov <zezo () spnet net>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:08:52 +0200

Hi,

Marshall Eubanks wrote:


Is there some reason why 65000 is especially problematic ?

65000 and above are private as numbers and should not be seen in theglobal table.


Cvetan

--
Cvetan Ivanov
System Administrator
SpectrumNet Jsc.

Current thread:

_65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Andy Davidson (Dec 10)
- Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Marshall Eubanks (Dec 10)
  - Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Cvetan Ivanov (Dec 10)
    - Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Marshall Eubanks (Dec 10)
    - Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 10)
    - Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 Joe Abley (Dec 11)
    - Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958 bill fumerola (Dec 11)