nanog mailing list archives
Re: uTorrent, IPv6
From: Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:48:06 +1200
On 20/08/2008, at 6:57 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/08/18/226228&from=rssWell, IPv6 usage is actually increasing fairly rapidly, anyway: <http://www.ams-ix.net/technical/stats/sflow/?type=ipv6>So, still, usage is not very impressive (and some of that might be NNTP traffic), but slant of the yearly graph actually is.
Yep, and you're only seeing native data there.Do you have any bead on how much of the IPv4 data is protocol 41 (I.e. IPv6 tunnelled over IPv4)?
I'm not going to ask you to find out how much of it is Teredo - that requires stateful DPI - but I expect it to be a non-insignificant number.
Those numbers can't be added together, because depending on a couple of factors (ie public relays and things), tunnelled traffic could be counted twice - once when encapsulated, once when native.
-- Nathan Ward
Current thread:
- uTorrent, IPv6 Nathan Ward (Aug 18)
- Re: uTorrent, IPv6 Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 18)
- Re: uTorrent, IPv6 Nathan Ward (Aug 18)
- Re: uTorrent, IPv6 Nathan Ward (Aug 18)
- Re: uTorrent, IPv6 Laird Popkin (Aug 19)
- Re: uTorrent, IPv6 Nathan Ward (Aug 18)
- RE: uTorrent, IPv6 michael.dillon (Aug 19)
- Re: uTorrent, IPv6 Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 19)
- Re: uTorrent, IPv6 Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 19)
- RE: uTorrent, IPv6 Mikael Lind (Aug 19)
- Re: uTorrent, IPv6 Nathan Ward (Aug 19)
- Re: uTorrent, IPv6 Nathan Ward (Aug 19)
- Re: uTorrent, IPv6 Nathan Ward (Aug 20)
- Re: uTorrent, IPv6 Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 19)
- Re: uTorrent, IPv6 Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 18)