nanog mailing list archives

RE: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6


From: Sean Siler <Sean.Siler () microsoft com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:52:16 -0700

Nope. XP does not support DHCPv6 - only Vista/Windows Server 2008 (and later) can do that.

Sean

-----Original Message-----
From: TJ [mailto:trejrco () gmail com]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 2:42 PM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: RE: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6

-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Wyble [mailto:charles () thewybles com]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 5:28 PM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6

Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 18 aug 2008, at 22:23, Dale W. Carder wrote:

DHCPv6
- doesn't ship w/ some OS's

Forget about it on XP,

Hmmm. MS says otherwise:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/network/ipv6/ipv6faq.mspx

Did you see somewhere on that site, that WinXP does DHCPv6?
I don't.  And it would be wrong, to boot.
(Not just IPv6 support - that is one simple command ...)


but it's in Vista. You can add it to BSD/Linux without too much
trouble (are there good, bugfree implementations for those yet?)

Bugfree? Nothing is bugfree :)
but Mac is a problem for prospective DHCPv6 users because the network
configuration mechanisms are fairly proprietary and DHCPv6 isn't
likely to be supported any time soon.

Hmmmm. I have yet to play with the Mac Ipv6 support (typing this on a Mac
now I should try in my lab later). What auto configuration mechanisms are
you referring to? Bonjour? Isn't there an RFC or two for Zeroconf?

No, I believe he is referring to the actual network configuration.
Not the (almost) automatic/automated service/device discovery ...



--
Charles Wyble (818) 280 - 7059

/TJ





Current thread: