nanog mailing list archives
RE: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:52:50 -0700
-----Original Message----- From: Scott Weeks [mailto:surfer () mauigateway com] ---------- trejrco () gmail com wrote: ------------ As a general rule, most clients are following the "If we gave them static IPv4 addresses we will give them static IPv6 addresses" (infrastructure, servers, etc). The whole SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 is a separate (albeit related) conversation ... ---------------------------------------------------- I'm still an IPv6 wussie and would like to learn more before moving forward, so would anyone care to share info on experiences with this decision? -- hcb () netcases net wrote: From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb () netcases net> To try to stay operational about this <snip> ------------------------ Seeing Howard's quick response saying "To try to stay operational about this..." makes me realize I may have inadvertently invited a religious flame fest. Please! Operational content and hands-on experiences only to the best of your ability. I want to learn from this, not delete the whole thread. scott
Current thread:
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6, (continued)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Charles Wyble (Aug 18)
- RE: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 TJ (Aug 18)
- RE: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Sean Siler (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Charles Wyble (Aug 18)
- RE: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Sean Siler (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Antonio Querubin (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Kevin Oberman (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 Antonio Querubin (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 David W. Hankins (Aug 18)
- Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6 David W. Hankins (Aug 18)