nanog mailing list archives

RE: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters?


From: "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb () byrneit net>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:28:44 -0700

If all you're using is BGP null routes, that's true. I would posit that
BCP include Prefix filtering and ACLs as well, with dynamic updates.
YMMV.


-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Adams [mailto:cmadams () hiwaay net] 
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 7:30 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters?

Once upon a time, Sam Stickland 
<sam_mailinglists () spacething org> said:
I think you misunderstand the meaning of the "ip verify 
unicasr source 
reachable-via any" command. When a packet arrives the 
router will drop 
it if it doesn't have a valid return path for the source. Since the 
source is a bogon, and routed to Null0, then the inbound 
packet is dropped.

First, that is only true on Cisco routers (all the world is 
not a Cisco).

Second, you are missing the point: you have bogon route for 
10/8, but rouge route for 10.1/16 (or even 10.0/9 and 
10.128/9) arrives; it is more specific and your automatic 
bogon filter is useless.

--
Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services 
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.




Current thread: