nanog mailing list archives
Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918"
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () baylink com>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 15:28:26 -0400
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 01:47:02PM -0400, Patrick Darden wrote:
I've always enjoyed your posts Michael. You are obviously an expert, with no patience for idiocy, and you always go for the throat and try to hurt the other person as much as you can. Your messages are always very entertaining.
You really think Michael is malicious in his intent? You've spent a whole lot of time paying now attention around here, haven't you?
As far as companies that design their own networks so they have trouble interoperating with themselves--well, bummer for them. I bet they wish they had done their design more efficiently instead of making "large sprawling" networks with plenty of room for growth for soda machines. Because you just can't assign enough IP address space for your soda machines. "Cute sound bites does (sic) not make you an expert in anything. " I agree with this too. But just because it's cute, doesn't mean it's wrong.
No, cute soundbites don't make you an expert. But in this case, Dillon's right, and you're wrong: your attempt to trivialize the specific issue on point (allocation within the 1918 space internal to a company network) by implying that the only reasons to do it the way he suggests amount to "leaving space for soda machines" only proves in public that you don't know what you're talking about. As randy would put it, I encourage my competitors to hire you to architect their WANs. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra () baylink com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24 St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274 Those who cast the vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything. -- (Josef Stalin)
Current thread:
- Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918", (continued)
- Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Marshall Eubanks (Aug 06)
- RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Darden, Patrick S. (Aug 06)
- RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" TJ (Aug 06)
- RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Darden, Patrick S. (Aug 06)
- Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Joel Jaeggli (Aug 06)
- RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Darden, Patrick S. (Aug 06)
- Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Joel Jaeggli (Aug 06)
- RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" TJ (Aug 06)
- RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" michael.dillon (Aug 07)
- Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Patrick Darden (Aug 07)
- Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 07)
- Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Patrick Darden (Aug 07)
- Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 07)
- RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Darden, Patrick S. (Aug 07)
- RE: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" TJ (Aug 12)
- Re: was bogon filters, now "Brief Segue on 1918" Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 06)
- Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters? Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 06)
- Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters? Randy Bush (Aug 06)
- Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters? Rob Thomas (Aug 06)
- Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters? Justin Shore (Aug 06)