Re: the O(N^2) problem

["Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>]

I received an off-list request: "Could you clarify what precisely you
are trying to secure?"  I fear that perhaps I am still too vague.

When one accepts an email[*], one wishes for some sort of _a priori_
information regarding message trustworthiness.  DKIM can vouch for
message authenticity, but not trust.  (A valid DKIM signature shows that
selected headers/content have not been forged, but does not vouch for
content.)

If I receive email from someone I trust, there's a good chance it's
something I want.  If from someone who someone I trust trusts, there's
still a good chance.  As the chain lengthens, trust becomes a bit
dicier.

What I propose is orthogonal to DKIM.

I've also been asked to set up a separate mailing list.  I'll do that,
and stop pollu^H^H^H^H^Htrying to elaborate on NANOG.

[*] Discussion limited to one example, but could be expanded.


Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
________________________________________________________________________
DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
davidc () brics com -*- jfconmaapaq () intc net -*- sam () everquick net
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.