nanog mailing list archives
Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter
From: Sam Stickland <sam_mailinglists () spacething org>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:54:39 +0100
Forrest wrote:
There's a couple of feature requests open at Cisco that would do this. Rodney Dunn (at Cisco) pushed quite hard for these but couldn't get any traction. As he's previously pointed out it would have if people would vote for them (attach a case to).Maybe this is a dumb question, but why isn't there a BGP option to just filter more specific routes that have the same AS path as the larger aggregate? This would allow the networks that announce more specifics for traffic engineering to still accomplish that, while throwing away the garbage from someone else that decides to announce their /19 as 33 routesfor no apparent reason. Sure, this would fail if a network decided to only announce /24's for example without a larger aggregate, but how many networks are really doing that?Forrest
FORWARDED MESSAGE: Rodney Dunn wrote:Take your pick. :)
CSCsa45474 Ability to block overlapping BGP prefixes from being installed in RIB or better: CSCsa46049 IOS RIB should not install overlapping routes with same next hop Rodney On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 05:26:51PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,> > On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:09:16AM -0400, Rodney Dunn wrote:> > Is there a CSC number that one could attach cases to? > > gert > -- > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!> > I could never get them to agree to do it before and I have no reason > > to believe anything has changed.> //www.muc.de/~gert/ > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert () greenie muc de > fax: +49-89-35655025 gert () net informatik tu-muenchen de
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp () puck nether net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Current thread:
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Randy Bush (Sep 09)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter William Allen Simpson (Sep 09)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Randy Bush (Sep 09)
- Message not available
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Randy Bush (Sep 09)
- Message not available
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Randy Bush (Sep 10)
- RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Alex Rubenstein (Sep 09)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Mark Tinka (Sep 09)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter randal k (Sep 09)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Andy Davidson (Sep 09)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter tony sarendal (Sep 09)
- Message not available
- RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Church, Charles (Sep 11)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Kevin Oberman (Sep 12)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Matt Liotta (Sep 20)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Jon Lewis (Sep 20)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Bora Akyol (Sep 20)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Jon Lewis (Sep 20)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter John A. Kilpatrick (Sep 21)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Pekka Savola (Sep 21)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Randy Bush (Sep 21)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Pekka Savola (Sep 21)