nanog mailing list archives
Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter
From: "tony sarendal" <dualcyclone () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 19:20:08 +0100
On 09/09/2007, Andy Davidson <andy () nosignal org> wrote:
On 9 Sep 2007, at 08:02, randal k wrote:This part here just boggles the mind. Not everybody out there that needs full routes is pushing enough bandwidth to justify the cost of a 720gbps backplane -- medium sized datacenters, regional ISPs, etc all really like full routes but may never see even 30gbps of traffic. Everybody I've talked to about this particular problem has the same feelings -- that big C is hanging their 6509 user base out to dry.There are Vendor C platforms that can push much more than 30Gbit, and take a full table comfortably, that cost a lot less than 6500 series kit.
That sounds very nice, what box is that ? I can't remeber our C rep mentioning anything about that, but in C's defense I'm not always paying attention. -- Tony Sarendal - dualcyclone () gmail com IP/Unix -= The scorpion replied, "I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
Current thread:
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter, (continued)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Adrian Chadd (Sep 09)
- Message not available
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Randy Bush (Sep 09)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter William Allen Simpson (Sep 09)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Randy Bush (Sep 09)
- Message not available
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Randy Bush (Sep 09)
- Message not available
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Randy Bush (Sep 10)
- RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Alex Rubenstein (Sep 09)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Mark Tinka (Sep 09)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter randal k (Sep 09)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Andy Davidson (Sep 09)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter tony sarendal (Sep 09)
- Message not available
- RE: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Church, Charles (Sep 11)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Kevin Oberman (Sep 12)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Matt Liotta (Sep 20)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Jon Lewis (Sep 20)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Bora Akyol (Sep 20)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Jon Lewis (Sep 20)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter John A. Kilpatrick (Sep 21)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Pekka Savola (Sep 21)
- Re: Route table growth and hardware limits...talk to the filter Randy Bush (Sep 21)