nanog mailing list archives

Re: Misguided SPAM Filtering techniques


From: "Al Iverson" <aiversonlists () spamresource com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:30:27 -0500


On 10/22/07, Sean Figgins <sean () labrats us> wrote:

Dave Pooser wrote:

Whenever I get one of those, I go ahead and confirm the message so the spam
gets through to the end user. I figure if they think I'm gonna filter their
mail for free, well, they get what they pay for.  :^)

And that is probably just fine, as 99% of the true spam comes from email
addresses (and often doamins) that either do not exist, or often are not
configured to receive email.

Cite?

I log only valid domains used as the PRA or MFROM in the spam I
receive, about 10k/day. Counting valid domains only, each domain is
only seen on about three different spams, when averaged out. That's a
hell of a lot of domains that actually exist, and I think a more
accurate assumption is that a significant nonzero amount of that
backscatter does actually reach a recipient mailbox on the other end.

Regards,
Al Iverson


-- 
Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com
News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com
My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com   --   Chicago, IL, USA
Remove "lists" from my email address to reach me faster and directly.


Current thread: