Re: Comcast blocking p2p uploads

["John C. A. Bambenek" <bambenek () gmail com>]

Well, as far as I'm concerned WoW can burn and get blocked with the
rest of the bad traffic because they are externalizing their
maintenance costs on others.  They should pay for the bandwidth to
update their own software.

On 10/19/07, Clinton Popovich <crpopovi () nauticom net> wrote:
> Who are we to say what is illegal traffic... I mean they could be
> downloading anything from p2p not just mp3's.. don't get me wrong I HATE WoW
> but it uses bittorrent to decentralize its updates.
>
> Clinton Popovich
> Systems Administrator
> Nauticom Internet Services - An NPSI Company
> 2591 Wexford-Bayne Road, Suite 400
> Sewickley, PA 15143
> Tel: 724-933-9540
> Fax: 724-933-9888
> Email: crpopovi () nauticom net
> Web: http://www.nauticom.net
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of John
> C. A. Bambenek
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 3:11 PM
> To: Steven M. Bellovin
> Cc: nanog () nanog org
> Subject: Re: Comcast blocking p2p uploads
>
>
> I love how the framed it as "data discrimination".  Let's just be
> honest... 99% of it was illegal traffic taking up far more than their
> fair share of bandwidth.
>
> On 10/19/07, Steven M. Bellovin <smb () cs columbia edu> wrote:
> >
> http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/technology/AP-Comcast-Data-Discrimination.ht
> ml
> >
> http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/technology/AP-Comcast-Data-Discrimination-Te
> sts.html
> > Not a lot more I can say, other than argghhh!
> >
> >
> >                 --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb