nanog mailing list archives
Re: Comcast blocking p2p uploads
From: Mike Lewinski <mike () rockynet com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:29:30 -0600
John C. A. Bambenek wrote:
I love how the framed it as "data discrimination". Let's just be honest... 99% of it was illegal traffic taking up far more than their fair share of bandwidth.
With the remaining 1% being Linux ISOs.I wonder what happens to these network police appliances (Sandvine, Packeteer etc) when the P2Ps implement encryption and tunnel it all over 443/tcp?
Current thread:
- p2p is no excuse - was: [Comcast blocking p2p uploads], (continued)
- p2p is no excuse - was: [Comcast blocking p2p uploads] Peter Dambier (Oct 21)
- Re: Comcast blocking p2p uploads Keith O'Neill (Oct 23)
- Re: Comcast blocking p2p uploads Keith O'Neill (Oct 23)
- Re: Comcast blocking p2p uploads Eric Spaeth (Oct 20)
- Re: Comcast blocking p2p uploads Joe Greco (Oct 20)
- Re: Comcast blocking p2p uploads Adrian Chadd (Oct 20)
- Re: Comcast blocking p2p uploads John C. A. Bambenek (Oct 19)
- Re: Comcast blocking p2p uploads Jack Bates (Oct 19)
- Re: Comcast blocking p2p uploads Mark Owen (Oct 19)
- RE: Comcast blocking p2p uploads Clinton Popovich (Oct 19)
- Re: Comcast blocking p2p uploads Eric Spaeth (Oct 19)
- RE: Comcast blocking p2p uploads Scott Berkman (Oct 19)
- RE: Comcast blocking p2p uploads Scott Berkman (Oct 19)
- Re: Comcast blocking p2p uploads Justin M. Streiner (Oct 19)