nanog mailing list archives
Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs]
From: Jeff Kell <jeff-kell () utc edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:31:02 -0500
Frank Bulk wrote:
Foundry OEMs from Meru, which also uses a single-channel approach. It does not have an L1 requirement.
Meru APs tunnel back to the controller, so any old L3 will do. We took an AP home (just for grins) and it still worked back to our controller through residential broadband. Jeff
Current thread:
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs, (continued)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Joel Jaeggli (Nov 10)
- RE: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Frank Bulk (Nov 12)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Randy Bush (Nov 12)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Joel Jaeggli (Nov 12)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Carl Karsten (Nov 12)
- RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Frank Bulk (Nov 13)
- Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Elmar K. Bins (Nov 13)
- RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Frank Bulk (Nov 13)
- Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Niels Bakker (Nov 13)
- RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Frank Bulk (Nov 13)
- Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Jeff Kell (Nov 13)
- Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Casey Callendrello (Nov 13)
- RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Frank Bulk (Nov 13)
- RE: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Church, Charles (Nov 09)