nanog mailing list archives
Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs]
From: "Elmar K. Bins" <elmi () 4ever de>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:46:07 +0100
frnkblk () iname com (Frank Bulk) wrote:
If you're going with Extricom you don't need to worry about channel planning beyond adding more "channel blankets".
Is that based on marketing, theory (based on the whitepapers and patent descriptions) or practical experience? Elmar.
Current thread:
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs, (continued)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Christopher Morrow (Nov 08)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Lamar Owen (Nov 09)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 09)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Adrian Chadd (Nov 09)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Joel Jaeggli (Nov 10)
- RE: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Frank Bulk (Nov 12)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Randy Bush (Nov 12)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Joel Jaeggli (Nov 12)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Carl Karsten (Nov 12)
- RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Frank Bulk (Nov 13)
- Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Elmar K. Bins (Nov 13)
- RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Frank Bulk (Nov 13)
- Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Niels Bakker (Nov 13)
- RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Frank Bulk (Nov 13)
- Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Jeff Kell (Nov 13)
- Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Casey Callendrello (Nov 13)
- RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] Frank Bulk (Nov 13)
- Re: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 09)
- RE: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs Church, Charles (Nov 09)