nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Advertisements
From: Donald Stahl <don () calis blacksun org>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 11:03:23 -0400 (EDT)
The upside is that in the block you're expected to accept /48s, nobody will have a /32. The downside is that anyone who gets a larger-than-minimum sized allocation/assignment can deaggregate down to that level.I don't think ARIN is planning on giving out more less a /48 but more than a /32- at least that was the impression I got. End sites get a /48- ISP's get a /32 or larger- and that's it (I could certainly be wrong). As such, deaggragation in the /48 block should not be an issue because no one will have more than a /48 in the first place.
-Don
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Brandon Butterworth (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Leo Vegoda (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Brandon Butterworth (May 29)
- RE: IPv6 Advertisements Azinger, Marla (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Brandon Butterworth (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements bmanning (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Joel Jaeggli (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Stephen Sprunk (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Owen DeLong (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Stephen Sprunk (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Jeff Kell (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Stephen Sprunk (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Jeroen Massar (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Valdis . Kletnieks (May 31)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Jeroen Massar (May 31)