nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Advertisements

From: Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 16:29:29 +0100 (BST)

I understand the problems but I think there are clear cut cases where 
/48's make sense- a large scale anycast DNS provider would seem to be a 
good candidate for a /48 and I would hope it would get routed. Then again 
that might be the only sensible reason...


Don't give people an excuse to deagg their /32

brandon

Current thread:

Re: IPv6 Advertisements, (continued)
- - - Re: IPv6 Advertisements John Kristoff (May 29)
    - Re: IPv6 Advertisements William F. Maton Sotomayor (May 29)
    - Re: IPv6 Advertisements Paul Vixie (May 29)
    - Message not available
    - Re: IPv6 Advertisements William F. Maton Sotomayor (May 29)
    - Re: IPv6 Advertisements Jeroen Massar (May 29)
    - Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
    - Re: IPv6 Advertisements Randy Bush (May 29)
    - Re: IPv6 Advertisements Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
    - Re: IPv6 Advertisements Stephen Sprunk (May 31)
    - Re: IPv6 Advertisements Jared Mauch (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Brandon Butterworth (May 29)
  - Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
    - Re: IPv6 Advertisements Leo Vegoda (May 29)
    - Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
- RE: IPv6 Advertisements Azinger, Marla (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Advertisements Brandon Butterworth (May 29)
  - Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 29)
  - Re: IPv6 Advertisements bmanning (May 29)
    - Re: IPv6 Advertisements Joel Jaeggli (May 29)
  - Re: IPv6 Advertisements Stephen Sprunk (May 31)
    - Re: IPv6 Advertisements Donald Stahl (May 31)

(Thread continues...)