nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
From: Andy Davidson <andy () nosignal org>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 12:38:38 +0100
On 29 May 2007, at 14:49, Alexander Harrowell wrote:
Isn't his point that y! could offer IPv6 e-mail in parallel to the existing IPv4 service, putting the IPv6 machines in a subdomain ipv6.yahoo.com, so that end users and networks who want to do it can do so without bothering the others?
This doesn't sound at all like a transitional plan whatsoever. If my home and office have v6 connections, but a hotel I am staying at does not, I shouldn't need to start reconfiguring layer 7 properties in my applications.
Some of my colleagues wont even know how to. Andy
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted, (continued)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Manolo Hernandez (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Manolo Hernandez (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted John Curran (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Alexander Harrowell (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Andy Davidson (May 31)
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted michael.dillon (May 31)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (May 29)
- using v6 specific names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Edward Lewis (May 29)
- IPv6 services trial michael.dillon (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted David Conrad (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Leo Vegoda (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 29)