nanog mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft and Teredo
From: Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 11:44:21 +1200
On 31/05/2007, at 10:52 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
Hi Nathan, I can probably talk about our own experience ...We started running Teredo Server+Relay in the Windows 2003 implementation around 3-4 years ago (not completely sure right now). Unfortunately, whenthe Service Pack (SP1 I think) was released, stopped working. Until then it was working perfectly, not any issue.Then we moved to a Linux with Miredo, and it has been working since them, first with the 6Bone prefix from Microsoft, then on 6/6/2006, we moved tothe RFC one, 2001::/32. No issues at all.
Where does it live in your network, at each POP, or just in a datacenter somewhere? Infact, what kind of network are you? (content, transit, access) How have you configured clients to talk to your Teredo server instead of the default MS one?
How do you get to the world? Native IPv6 or tunnels?Has it improved reachability/reliability of dual stack or v6-only content? How do you know? Any thoughts about how content providers could use Teredo servers/ relays to improve their connectivity?
-- Nathan Ward
Current thread:
- Microsoft and Teredo Sean Siler (May 30)
- Re: Microsoft and Teredo matthew zeier (May 30)
- Re: Microsoft and Teredo Nathan Ward (May 30)
- Re: Microsoft and Teredo JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 30)
- Re: Microsoft and Teredo Nathan Ward (May 30)
- Re: Microsoft and Teredo JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 30)
- Re: Microsoft and Teredo JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 30)
- RE: Microsoft and Teredo Sean Siler (May 31)
- Re: Microsoft and Teredo Adrian Chadd (May 31)
- Re: Microsoft and Teredo Nathan Ward (May 31)
- RE: Microsoft and Teredo michael.dillon (May 31)
- Re: Microsoft and Teredo Nathan Ward (May 31)
- RE: Microsoft and Teredo Sean Siler (May 31)
- Re: Microsoft and Teredo JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 31)
- Re: Microsoft and Teredo Adrian Chadd (May 31)
- Re: Microsoft and Teredo JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 31)