nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet () consulintel es>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:47:08 +0200
We do have dual stack in all our customer sites, and at the time being didn't got complains or support calls that may be considered due to the AAAA. I heard the same from other people. I also heard the opposite some times, but I haven't been able to debug any of those cases to understand where is the problem, except a few cases of people *not having stable IPv6 connectivity* and using AAAA in their servers: Bad practice ! Regards, Jordi
De: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com> Responder a: <owner-nanog () merit edu> Fecha: Tue, 29 May 2007 20:39:20 +0200 Para: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda () icann org> CC: NANOG list <nanog () nanog org> Asunto: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted On 29-mei-2007, at 18:17, Leo Vegoda wrote:http://ask.metafilter.com/63532/Trouble-with-Firefoxit ends with this comment: "If your hosting provider is serving your domain with IPv6, then it is time to find a new provider."I guess they can stick with their current hosting provider then, because:dig JournalistExpress.com aaaa; <<>> DiG 9.3.1 <<>> JournalistExpress.com aaaa ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 36772 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 Unfortunately, treading lightly as to not to wake the bugs means that they aren't fixed... In this regard, it would be interesting to hear from people who run non-trivial IPv6-enabled WWW sites about complaints about their reachability.
********************************************** The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 ! http://www.ipv6day.org This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
Current thread:
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted, (continued)
- RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted michael.dillon (May 31)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (May 29)
- using v6 specific names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Edward Lewis (May 29)
- IPv6 services trial michael.dillon (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted David Conrad (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Leo Vegoda (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Nathan Ward (May 29)
- IPv6 Deployment (Was: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted) Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment (Was: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted) JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 30)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment (Was: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted) Donald Stahl (May 30)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment (Was: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted) Kevin Loch (May 30)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment (Was: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted) JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 30)
- why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Edward Lewis (May 29)
- Re: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted David Conrad (May 29)
- Re: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Edward Lewis (May 29)
- Re: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted David Conrad (May 29)