nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 05:08:07 -1000
(*) Anyone advocating staying with IPv4 and relying on NAT and market demand as an alternative needs to consider the completely deaggregated address usage pattern (and routing table explosion) that results.
not that i think this a nice approach or anything, but ... it would seem that the size of the routing table in this case, as in others, is proportional to the number of end sites, pi multi-homed if that is the dominant policy, or pa aggregated if that is the dominant policy. randy
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted, (continued)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Message not available
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted John Curran (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Valdis . Kletnieks (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Adrian Chadd (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted John Curran (May 29)
- Message not available
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted William B. Norton (May 29)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Joe Greco (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Chris L. Morrow (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Jared Mauch (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Randy Bush (May 27)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (May 28)